Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is outlined as diabetes mellitus (DM) first detected after being pregnant. With the development of dwelling requirements, the incidence of GDM has been step by step rising, and the Worldwide Diabetes Federation (IDF) discovered that the worldwide prevalence in 2017 of sufferers in a mixed hyperglycemic state throughout being pregnant was 16.2%, of which GDM accounted for 86.4%.1 Furthermore, GDM has been discovered to extend the danger of antagonistic perinatal outcomes,2 resembling hypertension throughout being pregnant, amniotic fluid abnormalities, fetal malformations, macrosomia, neonatal respiratory misery syndrome, and neonatal hypoglycemia. As well as, the long-term maternal danger of sort 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), weight problems, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and atherosclerosis is considerably increased following GDM. Due to this fact, the right administration of hyperglycemia throughout being pregnant is a crucial alternative to cut back the danger of those circumstances.3,4
Most sufferers with GDM can management their blood glucose inside the regular vary by means of standardized administration, weight loss program adjustment, affordable train, and well timed monitoring. Due to this fact, on the premise of individualized dietary interventions and train steering, sufferers had been suggested to take part within the one-day clinic DM administration mannequin in our hospital. They achieved good outcomes, that are reported on this paper.
Supplies and Strategies
A complete of 995 pregnant girls with GDM who underwent prenatal checkups at our hospital had been enrolled between December 2018 and August 2020. These sufferers had been randomly divided right into a examine group (541 sufferers) and a management group (454 sufferers). At enrollment, the typical age of the examine group was 29.87 ± 3.77 years, and the typical gestational age was 26.74 ± 2.66 weeks. The common age of the management group at enrollment was 29.98 ± 4.08 years, and the typical gestational age was 26.31 ± 4.29 weeks. There have been no statistically important variations between the 2 teams basically traits, together with age, peak, pre-pregnancy weight, pre-pregnancy physique mass index (BMI), household historical past of DM, enrollment weight, enrollment BMI, and gestational age at enrollment (P > 0.05), indicating that the information had been comparable. This examine was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as was revised in 2013) and authorised by the Ethics Committee of The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang. Written knowledgeable consent was obtained from all contributors.
Inclusion and Exclusion Standards
In keeping with the rules revealed by the American Diabetes Affiliation in 2011, DM mixed with being pregnant is recognized when the fasting blood glucose (FBG) ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) ≥ 6.5%, or random blood glucose (BG) ≥ 11.1 mmol/L on the first being pregnant checkup with the presence of signs. Along with the above talked about DM mixed with being pregnant girls, pregnant girls at a gestational age of 24–28 weeks had been chosen to take a 75 g oral glucose tolerance take a look at (OGTT) to detect BG at three time factors: FBG, 1 h BG and a pair of h BG. The cut-off factors had been FBG of 5.1 mmol/L, 1h BG of 10 mmol/L, and 2h BG of 8.5 mmol/L, and sufferers with a BG equal to or increased than these values had been recognized with GDM.
Within the management group, individualized dietary interventions and train instruction had been carried out, and sufferers had been instructed to overview commonly. Within the examine group, individualized dietary interventions, train instruction, and participation within the one-day clinic for GDM had been carried out.
The one-day clinic was attended by an endocrinologist and a nurse, with the measurement of FBG and fetal heartbeat detected from 7:15 to 7:30 a.m., a meal appropriate for diabetic sufferers offered at 7:50 a.m., and a gymnastics session appropriate for pregnant girls given at 8:50 a.m. A lecture was delivered at 9:40 a.m., which included details about making nutritious meals, the analysis and hazards of GDM, susceptibility elements, dietary management strategies, meals alternate, train, BG monitoring and overview, postpartum overview, and precautions; psychological steering was additionally offered. Every affected person’s two-hour postprandial BG (2 h PBG) was detected at 9:50 a.m., adopted by a relaxation. BG was detected once more at 12:00 p.m., adopted by one other meal and a relaxation. One other gymnastics session was carried out at 1:00 p.m., adopted by a video presentation about childbirth and breastfeeding. 2 h PBG was detected once more at 2:00 p.m., adopted by individualized steering primarily based on the detected BG, a question-and-answer session, post-session quiz, questionnaire distribution, and enrollment in a diabetes administration WeChat group. A 3rd meal was offered at 3:30 p.m., and the clinic actions had been accomplished at 4:00 p.m. After the clinic, the WeChat group commonly launched info associated to DM, offered follow-up solutions, and supervised the sufferers so as to overview their situation. The sufferers had been additionally adopted up with well timed one-to-one steering.
Prenatal, enrolment and pre-delivery physique weight and BMI had been recorded respectively in each teams, as well as, FBG and HbA1C had been recorded at enrolment, earlier than supply and postpartum. Insulin software, gestational age at supply, mode of supply, and the variety of circumstances with gestational hypertension, extreme amniotic fluid, untimely rupture of membranes, placental abruption, macrosomia, untimely start, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal jaundice, and neonatal respiratory misery syndrome had been additionally recorded intimately.
Furthermore, OGTT and insulin launch take a look at outcomes had been carried out postpartum. The insulin launch take a look at was used to guage the operate of maternal islet cells.
Regular worth of OGTT: Fasting blood glucose ranged from 3.9 to six.1mmol/L. 0.5~1 hour after oral administration of glucose, blood glucose reached a peak (usually 7.8 ~ 9.0mmol/L), with a peak worth of lower than 11.1mmol/L. After 2 hours of oral administration of glucose, the blood glucose was lower than 7.8mmol/L, and the blood glucose returned to the fasting degree after 3 hours. Check outcomes exterior the traditional vary are thought-about irregular OGTT outcomes.
Insulin launch take a look at outcomes: After 8–12 hours of fasting, about 250~300 mL of 75 g anhydrous glucose answer was given to the puerpera inside 5 minutes. Plasma insulin ranges had been measured at fasting and 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h after glucose administration.
Regular worth of insulin launch take a look at: basal plasma insulin in regular topics was 5 ~ 20 mU/L, and it rose to the height worth after 30 ~ 60 min of oral glucose (it might be 5 ~ 10 occasions of the basal worth, and most of them had been 50 ~ 100 mU/L). Three hours after oral glucose the insulin was diminished to the baseline degree. Check outcomes exterior the traditional vary are thought-about to be irregular islet operate.
SPSS 23.0 software program was used for statistical evaluation. The measurement knowledge had been expressed as ± s and a t-test was used for comparison between the two groups. The countable data were expressed as percentages (%) and the χ2 test was adopted for comparison between the two groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
As shown in Table 1, there have been no statistically important variations in age, peak, pre-pregnancy weight, pre-pregnancy BMI, household historical past of DM, enrollment weight, enrollment BMI, and gestational age at enrollment between the 2 teams (P > 0.05).
Changes in the Body Weight (BW) in the Pregnant Women with GDM After Intervention Therapy
There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in weight gain and BMI growth from pre-pregnancy to enrollment (P > 0.05). But the weight gain and BMI growth of the women in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group from enrollment to pre-delivery and during pregnancy (P < 0.05). (See Table 2)
Changes in BG After Intervention Therapy
There were no statistically significant differences in FBG and HbA1C between the two groups at enrollment (P > 0.05). In the study group, FBG and HbA1C were lower before delivery than at enrollment (P < 0.05). But in the control group, in the same time period FBG was lower and HbA1C was higher (P < 0.05). Before delivery, both FBG and HbA1C in the study group were numerically lower than those in the control group, but only the difference in FBG was statistically significant (P < 0.01), while the difference in HbA1C did not meet the statistical standard. But there was significant differences in the change of FBG and HbA1C between the two groups from enrollment to pre-delivery (P < 0.01). Moreover, The therapeutic rate of insulin in the study group was higher than which in the control group (P < 0.05). (See Table 3)
Postpartum BG and Islet Function
The postpartum review rate and the differences in postpartum FBG and HbA1C were not statistically significant between the two groups (P > 0.05). The proportion of abnormal postpartum OGTT results and postpartum islet function in study group was lower than which in control group (P < 0.05). The reexamination rate was 61.3% in the study group but only 21.4% in the control group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.01). (See Table 4)
Perinatal Complications and Modes of Delivery
The incidence of premature rupture of membranes was lower in the study group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of the incidence of perinatal complications, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, excessive/low amniotic fluid, placental abruption, and mode of delivery (P > 0.05). (See Table 5)
Desk 5 Comparability of Perinatal Problems and Modes of Supply Between the Two Teams (χ2)
Outcomes of Neonates
The incidence of macrosomia and neonatal jaundice within the examine group was decrease than within the management group, and the distinction was statistically important (P < 0.05). The variations between the 2 teams within the incidence of neonatal problems, gestational age of new child, prematurity, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal respiratory misery syndrome, intrauterine fetal dying, and fetal misery weren’t statistically important (P > 0.05). (See Table 6)
Desk 6 Comparability of Neonatal Outcomes Between the Two Teams (χ2)
With the continual enchancment of dwelling requirements and the liberalization of the two-child coverage in China, the incidence of GDM is rising yearly, severely affecting the well being and prognosis of moms and neonates. The efficient management of BG in pregnant girls with GDM and the avoidance of problems is subsequently of nice significance to maternal and toddler well being and prognosis.
Within the one-day clinic DM administration mannequin, in contrast to conventional GDM administration strategies, schooling consisting of a mix of lectures, demonstrations, and sensible expertise is adopted to show sufferers about the usage of meals alternate, dietary modifications, self-monitoring strategies, precautions for BG, and train. After a day of consuming meals within the clinic, sufferers have a higher understanding of meals mixtures and the amount of meals in normal meals with mounted dietary vitality; in addition they study appropriate train ranges and strategies and the hurt GDM can current to moms and infants, permitting them to study efficient self-management strategies. Sufferers who attend the clinic are additionally in a position to monitor the modifications of their situation based on a physician’s directions and actively observe directions for weight loss program management and train to successfully management BG and weight. This improves being pregnant outcomes and the security of each the mom and neonate.
Weight acquire is a crucial management indicator for sufferers with GDM. It has been discovered that weight acquire throughout being pregnant is an unbiased danger issue for fetal overgrowth in sufferers with GDM: extreme weight acquire throughout being pregnant will increase the neonatal start weight by almost 0.5 kg, and the incidence of perinatal problems and neonatal hypoglycemia will increase considerably.5 Extreme gestational weight acquire in pregnant girls with GDM additionally considerably will increase the danger of creating gestational hypertension.6 Nonetheless, you will need to be aware that insufficient weight acquire in girls throughout being pregnant additionally will increase the danger of preterm supply and results in fetuses being small for his or her gestational age.7 Due to this fact, controlling weight acquire throughout being pregnant is of nice significance to sufferers with GDM. Within the current examine, the sufferers within the examine group had been requested through the one-day clinic to watch their weight modifications each week and make sure the will increase stayed inside a sure vary. The outcomes confirmed that weight acquire and BMI progress within the examine group between enrollment and pre-delivery and all through being pregnant had been decrease than within the management group, indicating that the load management of sufferers with GDM who underwent a unified one-day clinic for DM administration was simpler. Controlling weight acquire throughout being pregnant and guaranteeing it remained inside the usual vary additionally ensured a provide of vitamin to the mom and neonate and improved BG management, which is conducive to postpartum restoration.
Elevated BG is a major danger issue that will increase the antagonistic outcomes of moms and neonates. Earlier research have proven that GDM is intently correlated with the prevalence of hypertension throughout being pregnant8 and that poor BG management can result in an elevated incidence of long-term struggling for each the mom and toddler, together with T2DM, weight problems, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, irregular cardiovascular metabolism, and different circumstances.9–11 Though hyperglycemia throughout being pregnant usually disappears after supply, extended insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction are additionally noticed in sufferers with GDM and might persist after supply.12 The current examine discovered that the FBG and HbA1C in examine teams had been decrease earlier than supply than at enrollment, and earlier than supply FBG within the examine group was decrease than that within the management group. It signifies that the sufferers had higher glycemic management after the one-day clinic. In the course of the postpartum overview, sufferers within the examine group had decrease proportion of irregular OGTT outcomes and irregular pancreatic islet operate than these within the management group, which means that, after adopting the therapeutic mannequin of the one-day clinic, sufferers may have higher glycemic management and the next restoration fee of postpartum BG and islet operate; this might have profound significance for decreasing and delaying the prevalence of postpartum T2DM in sufferers with GDM.13 Nonetheless, this outcome must be additional confirmed, as sufferers within the management group had poor compliance and the overview charges of OGTT and the insulin launch take a look at had been decrease within the management group than within the examine group.
Within the current examine, there was a major distinction between the 2 teams within the fee of insulin medicine, with the examine group having the next fee of insulin medicine than the management group; this could be because of the higher compliance and better common overview fee of the sufferers who attended the one-day clinic for DM administration. In the course of the examine, insulin remedy was given to sufferers in accordance with the usual of their BG management and in a well timed method; if a affected person solely had excessive FBG, small doses of the Insulin Detemir got to regulate BG. The management group, nonetheless, had poor compliance and low common overview charges, with many sufferers not receiving insulin remedy in a well timed method when their BG was poorly managed. The outcomes of the current examine counsel that, for sufferers with GDM whose BG management is sufficient after weight loss program management and affordable train, the well timed software of insulin remedy is helpful for BG management and the restoration of postpartum islet operate and reduces the danger of antagonistic being pregnant outcomes, which is in step with the outcomes of earlier research.14
Standard individualized dietary interventions and train instruction are restricted by time and the comprehension of the affected person and are sometimes formal and missing in operability, making it tough for pregnant girls to implement the information they’ve acquired, thus decreasing compliance with the therapy.15 The one-day clinic DM administration mannequin addresses these limitations by delivering details about GDM, providing steering on cooking meals which might be appropriate for folks with diabetes, demonstrating appropriate workout routines, and establishing a WeChat administration group to enhance affected person participation and compliance. This has resulted in attaining the objective of controlling BG and decreasing the incidence of antagonistic being pregnant outcomes.
Between 15 and 45% of pregnancies in girls with GDM end in macrosomia.16 Earlier research have proven that the prevalence of GDM macrosomia is correlated with the household historical past of diabetes in pregnant girls, BMI earlier than being pregnant, weight acquire throughout being pregnant and fasting blood glucose enhance. Among the many antagonistic outcomes of GDM macrosomia, the danger of neonatal hypoglycemia was 1. 599 occasions that of non-macrosomia.17 The creating fetus has restricted skill to synthesize glucose by itself. Glucose from the mom’s blood can cross the placenta, whereas insulin doesn’t. Due to this fact, maternal excessive blood sugar can result in neonatal weight problems.18 Extreme nutrient storage can result in start weight acquire or macrosomia. Many of the weight problems is concentrated within the fetal stomach and shoulders, which will increase the danger of shoulder dystocia and start damage.19 The presence of GDM, together with different danger elements resembling hypertension and weight problems throughout being pregnant, can even result in untimely labor and supply.20 Due to this fact, probably the most direct antagonistic being pregnant consequence of GDM sufferers with poor blood glucose and weight management is macrosomia, which can result in a collection of different antagonistic being pregnant outcomes. One examine discovered that as much as 12 hours of complete dietary care considerably reduces the incidence of macrosomia in sufferers with GDM.21 It has additionally been proven that dietary management and applicable train can successfully management BG and scale back the incidence of antagonistic being pregnant outcomes in sufferers with GDM.22 The current examine aimed to analyze the impression on perinatal outcomes in sufferers with GDM of the one-day clinic DM administration mannequin in contrast with individualized dietary intervention and train steering. The examine discovered that the incidence of untimely rupture of membranes, macrosomia, and neonatal jaundice had been decrease within the examine group than within the management group, however there have been no statistically important variations within the incidence of perinatal problems, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, extreme/low amniotic fluid, placental abruption, mode of supply, neonatal problems, preterm start, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal respiratory misery syndrome, intrauterine fetal dying, and fetal misery between the 2 teams. Sufferers included within the one-day clinic DM administration had good compliance. That they had higher BG and weight management, which diminished the incidence of macrosomia. Nonetheless, because of the advanced and different causes of antagonistic being pregnant outcomes, blood glucose and physique weight had been solely a part of them. On this examine, the incidence of untimely rupture of membranes, macrosomia and neonatal jaundice had been completely different, whereas no distinction was present in different antagonistic being pregnant outcomes.
The event of GDM is said to the impaired glucose tolerance brought on by the dysfunction of maternal pancreatic β-cells.23 Glucose passes by means of the placenta to the fetus and causes elevated fetal insulin secretion, stimulating fetal progress, leading to macrosomia and Older than gestational age (LGA).24 As well as, throughout regular pregnancies, the mom develops progressive insulin resistance underneath the affect of placental hormones. As a way to keep glucose homeostasis within the physique underneath these circumstances, pancreatic β-cells should launch extra insulin than ordinary to control maternal blood sugar ranges and guarantee that there’s sufficient vitamins to assist the wholesome progress of the fetus. Nonetheless, GDM happens when maternal pancreatic β-cells are unable to adapt to the metabolic modifications that accompany being pregnant. On this examine, on the premise of individualized weight loss program intervention and train steering, pregnant girls within the examine group had been additionally given one-day clinic DM administration intervention. Via explaining GDM associated information, displaying diabetic weight loss program, demonstrating train, establishing WeChat administration group, well timed one-to-one steering was offered to sufferers till postpartum. This administration strategy improves affected person participation and compliance, allows sufferers to observe a standardized weight loss program and train routine for GDM in the long run, and allows sufferers with poor glycemic management to provoke insulin remedy in a well timed method. Good management of BG throughout being pregnant can scale back insulin resistance, scale back the prevalence of macrosomia, defend the operate of maternal pancreatic β-cell, and thus play a great position within the restoration of postpartum BG and pancreatic islet operate.
The adoption of the one-day clinic DM administration mannequin to observe up sufferers with GDM and supply well timed one-to-one steering can successfully management weight acquire and BG throughout being pregnant, leading to increased charges of postpartum restoration of BG and islet operate and decreasing the incidence of untimely rupture of membranes, macrosomia, and neonatal jaundice. Nonetheless, the incidence of gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, extreme/low amniotic fluid, placental abruption, mode of supply, untimely start, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal respiratory misery syndrome, intrauterine fetal dying, and fetal misery in sufferers who obtain intervention with the one-day clinic mannequin doesn’t differ considerably from the incidence of those circumstances in sufferers who obtain standard individualized dietary intervention and train instruction. The one-day clinic DM administration mannequin may have profound implications for decreasing and delaying the onset of postpartum T2DM in sufferers with GDM.
The authors declare that they don’t have any competing pursuits.
1. Worldwide Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas.
2. Metzger BE, Buchanan TA, Coustan DR, et al. Abstract and suggestions of the fifth worldwide workshop-conference on gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(Suppl 2):S251–S260. doi:10.2337/dc07-s225
3. Wu LL, Niu JM. [Gestational diabetes mellitus: an opportunity for maternal and infant cardiometabolic risk prevention]. Chin J Pract Intern Med. 2018;38:527–530. [Chinese].
4. Chen LW, Soh SE, Tint MT, et al. Mixed evaluation of gestational diabetes and maternal weight standing from pre-pregnancy by means of post-delivery in future growth of sort 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2021;11:5021. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-82789-x
5. Parellada CB, Asbjörnsdóttir B, Ringholm L, Damm P, Mathiesen ER. Fetal progress in relation to gestational weight acquire in girls with sort 2 diabetes: an observational examine. Diabet Med. 2014;31:1681–1689. doi:10.1111/dme.12558
6. Egan AM, Dennedy MC, Al-Ramli W, Heerey A, Avalos G, Dunne F. ATLANTIC-DIP: extreme gestational weight acquire and being pregnant outcomes in girls with gestational or pregestational diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:212–219. doi:10.1210/jc.2013-2684
7. Goldstein RF, Abell SK, Ranasinha S, et al. Affiliation of gestational weight acquire with maternal and toddler outcomes: a scientific overview and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2017;317:2207–2225. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.3635
8. Corrigan L, O’Farrell A, Moran P, Daly D. Hypertension in being pregnant: prevalence, danger elements and outcomes for girls birthing in Eire. Being pregnant Hypertens. 2021;24:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.preghy.2021.02.005
9. Mai C, Wang B, Wen J, Lin X, Niu J. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 and AGEs are related to cardiovascular danger elements in girls with historical past of gestational diabetes mellitus. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30:241–244. doi:10.3109/09513590.2013.871522
10. Tam WH, Ma RCW, Ozaki R, et al. In utero publicity to maternal hyperglycemia will increase childhood cardiometabolic danger in offspring. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:679–686. doi:10.2337/dc16-2397
11. Grunnet LG, Hansen S, Hjort L, et al. Adiposity, dysmetabolic traits, and earlier onset of feminine puberty in adolescent offspring of girls with gestational diabetes mellitus: a medical examine inside the Danish Nationwide Start Cohort. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:1746–1755. doi:10.2337/dc17-0514
12. Miao Z, Wu H, Ren L, et al. Lengthy-term postpartum outcomes of insulin resistance and β-cell operate in girls with earlier gestational diabetes mellitus. Int J Endocrinol. 2020;2020:7417356. doi:10.1155/2020/7417356
13. Cui JJ, Li ZY, Wang ZL. [Effects of gestational diabetes mellitus on long-term abnormal glucose metabolism in women]. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet. 2021;37:152–156. [Chinese].
14. Di CH. [Effects of insulin therapy on pregnancy outcome in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus]. Chin J Mod Drug Appl. 2021;15:205–207. [Chinese].
15. Solar X, Su SP, Solar WJ, Zhang L, Zhou YF, Yang HX. [Evaluation of diabetic pregnancy outcome and one-day care for gestational diabetes mellitus after application of new diagnostic criteria]. Chin J Perinat Med. 2014;17:186–190. [Chinese].
16. Kc Ok, Shakya S, Zhang H. Gestational diabetes mellitus and macrosomia: a literature overview. Ann Nutr Metab. 2015;66(Suppl 2):14–20. doi:10.1159/000371628
17. Chen YR, Duan XK, Liu CF, et al. [Analysis of influencing factors and pregnancy outcomes of macrosomia among pregnant women with diabetes in a hospital in Zhengzhou City from 2014 to 2018]. Chin J Gen Pract. 2021;19:959–960. [Chinese].
18. Logan KM, Gale C, Hyde MJ, Santhakumaran S, Modi N. Diabetes in being pregnant and toddler adiposity: systematic overview and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Youngster Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017;102:F65–F72. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2015-309750
19. Sovio U, Murphy HR, Smith GC. Accelerated fetal progress previous to analysis of gestational diabetes mellitus: a potential cohort examine of nulliparous girls. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:982–987. doi:10.2337/dc16-0160
20. Dunn AB, Hanson L, VandeVusse L, Leslie S. Via the microbial wanting glass: untimely labor, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes: a scoping overview. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2019;33:35–51. doi:10.1097/JPN.0000000000000375
21. Yuan Ok, Wang H, Chen Y, et al. A 12-hour complete vitamin care advantages blood glucose degree and weight acquire and improves outcomes in pregnant girls with gestational diabetes mellitus. Ann Palliat Med. 2020;9:661–670. doi:10.21037/apm.2020.03.16
22. Brown J, Alwan NA, West J, et al. Life-style interventions for the therapy of girls with gestational diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;5:CD011970.
23. Plows JF, Stanley JL, Baker PN, Reynolds CM, Vickers MH. The pathophysiology of gestational diabetes mellitus. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:3342. doi:10.3390/ijms19113342
24. Ovesen PG, Fuglsang J, Andersen MB, Wolff C, Petersen OB, David McIntyre H. Temporal traits in gestational diabetes prevalence, therapy, and outcomes at Aarhus College Hospital, Skejby, between 2004 and 2016. J Diabetes Res. 2018;2018:5937059. doi:10.1155/2018/5937059